Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Electronic encyclopedias. --- Encyclopedias - General

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A study of the role community, financial support, texts, information structures, interfaces, and technology plays in collaborative works.

User generated content. --- Communication in learning and scholarship --- Curatorship. --- Electronic encyclopedias --- Authorship --- Encyclopedias and dictionaries --- Technological innovations --- Collaboration --- Authorship. --- Chambers, Robert, --- Wikipedia.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is built by a community - a community of Wikipedians who are expected to "assume good faith" when interacting with one another. In Good Faith Collaboration, Joseph Reagle examines this unique collaborative culture. Wikipedia, says Reagle, is not the first effort to create a freely shared, universal encyclopedia; its early twentieth-century ancestors include Paul Otlet's Universal Repository and H.G. Wells's proposal for a World Brain. Both these projects, like Wikipedia, were fuelled by new technology-which at the time included index cards and microfilm. What distinguishes Wikipedia from these and other more recent ventures is Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture, as seen not only in the writing and editing of articles but also in their discussion pages and edit histories. Keeping an open perspective on both knowledge claims and other contributors, Reagle argues, creates an extraordinary collaborative potential. Wikipedia is famously an encyclopedia "anyone can edit," and Reagle examines Wikipedia's openness and several challenges to it: technical features that limit vandalism to articles; private actions to mitigate potential legal problems; and Wikipedia's own internal bureaucratization. He explores Wikipedia's process of consensus (reviewing a dispute over naming articles on television shows) and examines the way leadership and authority work in an open content community. Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been imitated, analyzed, and satirized. Despite the social unease over its implications for individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the character (and quality) of cultural products, Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the century-old pursuit of a universal encyclopedia."--Jacket.

Electronic encyclopedias --- Wikis (Computer science) --- Communication in learning and scholarship --- Authorship --- Online social networks --- Encyclopédies électroniques --- Wikis (Informatique) --- Communication savante --- Coauteurs --- Réseautage personnel (Informatique) --- Congresses --- Technological innovations --- Collaboration --- Case studies --- Congrès --- Innovations --- Cas, Etudes de --- Wikipedia. --- Case studies. --- Electronic social networks --- Social networking Web sites --- Virtual communities --- Social media --- Social networks --- Sociotechnical systems --- Web sites --- Authoring (Authorship) --- Writing (Authorship) --- Literature --- Communication in scholarship --- Scholarly communication --- Learning and scholarship --- WikiForums --- WikiWikiWebs --- Forums (Discussion and debate) --- Encyclopedias and dictionaries --- Interactive encyclopedias --- Multimedia encyclopedias --- Online encyclopedias --- Electronic publications --- Electronic reference sources --- Communities, Online (Online social networks) --- Communities, Virtual (Online social networks) --- Online communities (Online social networks) --- Library and information services --- Information technology: general topics --- Impact of science and technology on society